QUESTION: In the spring I joined a camera club, hoping that I would learn more about photography and raise the level of excellence of my pictures. Many of the members are generous with their tips and general advice, and I learn a lot from listening.
This summer, however, during informal gatherings of some of the members, I have become confused because of the extreme differences of opinion about point-and-shoot cameras.I have the feeling that people who are more experienced in the hobby tend to look down their noses at point-and-shoot cameras. I have learned that many photography courses insist on manual cameras during instruction and that point-and-shoot ones are not permitted. Others praise these cameras as the bringer of photography to millions.
Can you act as a referee in this bout?
ANSWER: I'm not sure that I can settle this issue, particularly since I understand the feelings of both sides.
People who began their photography before the fully automatic cameras were available are smug because they had to learn all facets of exposure, focusing and film speed from scratch. Most shoot with SLRs, and they are usually very serious about their composition. I think many resent the ease of use of the automatics.
I personally believe very strongly in the use of high technology. I have labored hours and hours over the correct exposure and the perfect setup of a portrait. Now I let the camera do all that and I can devote all my time to taking just the picture I want, without worry.
I use an auto-focusing single lens reflex and have several compacts. My manual cameras have been put on the shelf as a reminder of more difficult times.
QUESTION: I have a situation coming up that is a first for me. I am going out west, to South Dakota, Utah and Arizona, for a two-week trip on my motorcycle. I want to take plenty of pictures and need some advice.
I am planning to take my Nikon F3 or FE2 (or maybe both). I have a 28mm lens, a 28mm-70mm zoom and a 70mm-210mm zoom. I am planning to keep the longer zoom on the camera.
I shoot slides and usually use Fuji film. Will that be OK? I have never seen that part of the country and don't know what to expect in the way of light or other picture-taking conditions.
ANSWER: No matter how you get there, you are going to one of the most beautiful and photogenic sections of the nation.
First, you'll find extremely bright light. Don't be surprised if you find yourself working at two stops higher than you are used to.
Next, you are going to see things unlike those on the Eastern Seaboard. The mountains are higher and more rugged; the trees look and photograph differently; parts of the territory you cover will be flat and expansive. You'll see many kinds of wildlife and dozens of species of birds.
All these things can make great pictures. You'll be able to stand at one spot on a mountain and shoot pictures in a circle all around you.
If you're used to the Fuji film, stick with it. I would recommend ISO 50 for most of your shooting, but take along a couple of rolls of ISO 400 just in case. You should also invest in at least one roll of print film. I suggest the Fuji Reala.
And while you're buying, you might well want to invest in a polarizing filter for that long telephoto lens. You'll be amazed at the difference in color saturation it can make. If nothing else, cover those lenses with UV filters.
Take both Nikons and both zooms. This will give you versatility and insurance against one body failing. Pack your gear in a padded camera bag, and consider wrapping each unit in a soft, lintless towel. Professional riders I spoke with suggest that the best place to carry that bag is in a tank bag. It's safer and easy to get to.
Write to Carl Kramer c-o Weekend, The Washington Post, 1150 15th St. NW, Washington, DC 20071.