When Richard Campbell, a communications professor at the University of Michigan, first tells us that "60 Minutes" - the inherently adversarial "newsmagazine" that rode to the top of TV ratings on the tidal wave of cynicism that swept the country after Watergate - is a stalwart defender of the status quo, our first thought is that he must be another tenured radical bearing a grudge from the '60s.

View Comments

After reading this meticulously close study of 100 "60 Minutes" shows over 22 years, however, we begin to see clearly that the show simplifies and dramatizes a complex world by subscribing to a set of "mythologies"; e.g., facts are "transparent and unambiguous" and, as Morley Safer once put it, every story has "one sweetheart and one SOB."Refreshingly, though, Campbell is not simplistically faulting this distortion. His use of the word "myth" might appear derisive, but he is ultimately grateful not only that the show gives his grandmother "characters to yell at," but that it provides all of us with the kind of shared knowledge we need "to live together in a contemporary yet contradictory democracy. . . ." - By Alex Raskin (Los Angeles Times)

Join the Conversation
Looking for comments?
Find comments in their new home! Click the buttons at the top or within the article to view them — or use the button below for quick access.