In response to a letter about the Elks bill (Forum, March 23), I ask, is there something about the Elks Club that provides a vital function for women that they must be accepted or suffer some disadvantage? Does Elks (or any other social club) membership provide social status, business networking opportunities or advantages that cannot be found anywhere else? If so, then the opportunities would be rightly made available to women. If the quest for membership in these types of clubs is just to make a point, then the women have no business trying to get in.

I've heard commentary that, because of their relationship with the state (from whom the clubs obtain their liquor license), they have a public duty not to discriminate against women and minorities. Forget the fact that members pay dues to associate in an environment of their choice. This doesn't mean they hate women.I have a home. I can invite anybody I want into it. I can give anyone I want "membership" in the social gatherings I hold in my living room. If someone asks if they can come to my home, I can refuse them entry. This does not mean I hate people. It just means I have the right to associate with whomever I want. And this, in spite of the fact that I have a relationship with the state - I pay taxes to the state (on the income I use to pay for my home and on the food I serve at my parties), obtain a driver's license and register my car with the state.

If a woman comes to my house and demands to have dinner with my family, or demands a ride in my car, am I going to be sued for denying her?

Kent Dayton

View Comments

Provo

Join the Conversation
Looking for comments?
Find comments in their new home! Click the buttons at the top or within the article to view them — or use the button below for quick access.