NEW YORK — Connie Chung's long-awaited interview Thursday with Congressman Gary Condit was like a televised fencing match that ended with no blood drawn.

Condit, who agreed to the interview and largely set the ground rules, did little to shed light on his role in the investigation into Chandra Levy's disappearance. He left the ABC correspondent clearly exasperated.

"He was determined to say what he wanted and no more," Chung said at the conclusion of ABC's "Prime Time Thursday."

The interview was the most eagerly anticipated TV spectacle of the summer, and television journalism's most sought-after interview since Monica Lewinsky. The seven-term California Democrat, who has been a spectral presence on television screens for months, would finally be heard from.

What viewers got was an elliptical journey as Chung tried, to no avail, to pin down Condit's relationship with the missing intern. Condit uttered Clinton-like statements that he made mistakes in his marriage but said he wouldn't say more about the relationship at the request of the Levy family.

His determination to stay on script cost Chung valuable time, particularly in fruitless attempts to find out about a watch box that Condit had discarded and why Condit would not take the independent lie detector test requested by police.

Fortunately, Chung got some of the basic questions out of the way fast: "Do you know what happened to Chandra Levy?" and "Did you have anything to do with her disappearance?" He answered no to both questions.

Chung researched a Condit quote calling on former President Bill Clinton to reveal details of the Lewinsky affair and sharply threw it back at Condit. His immediate attempts to filibuster foreshadowed the rest of the interview.

Since Condit would agree to talk for only 30 minutes, it left Chung with little time to probe his thoughts on his political career and his behavior as the investigation dragged on.

Financial adviser John Mensonides is a Republican who supported Condit — but not after watching the interview.

"I was hoping to see some humility and some candor, and instead we saw evasiveness and arrogance," said Mensonides, 37, of Condit's hometown of Modesto, who watched it with a group at a hotel.

View Comments

"Every decision that he has made to date smacks of putting his own interests first, and that is not something that you expect of somebody you elect to represent you," he said.

"I just wish he would have said that in the beginning," said Hope Barthel, a 45-year-old computer programmer in Merced of Condit's statement he had nothing to do with Levy's disappearance.

Karen Johnson, a 43-year-old business owner in Condit's district, said after watching the interview that he "continues to be evasive in his answers, and my perception is that his bigger interest is in protecting his own interests. I'm disappointed."

Ultimately, the one question a viewer wanted Chung to ask Condit was simply, "Why are you here?"

Join the Conversation
Looking for comments?
Find comments in their new home! Click the buttons at the top or within the article to view them — or use the button below for quick access.