Facebook Twitter

Y. simmers over Kennedy Center plan

SHARE Y. simmers over Kennedy Center plan

PROVO — Compared to other college campus uprisings, a protest at Brigham Young University over a recommendation to revamp a popular international-studies program is quite civil.

"If this was taking place anywhere else I'd be getting boos and catcalls and being shouted down," said Noel Reynolds, a top BYU administrator who fielded questions last week about the proposals from a crowd of about 200 students during a forum.

Still, it's not often students and alumni publicly rebuke the administrative powers-that-be at the school owned by The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints.

And sentiment is growing more heated as word spreads about an early-stage recommendation to scale back programs offered through BYU's David M. Kennedy Center for International Studies. The center was created in 1983 to coordinate the various international efforts in departments across campus.

The center — though not an academic department — also oversees some interdisciplinary classes, foreign study programs, internships and community-service efforts.

According to the recommendation, instead of building more courses and seeking more resources from the university, the Kennedy Center should maintain four undergraduate programs and 17 minors while mostly providing expertise for academic departments developing international programs.

The recommendations come from a panel that was convened in October to examine the center's International and Area Studies program. Panelists scrutinized the governance of the program, the rigor of courses and whether it had adequate funding and faculty support.

To the chagrin of some students and faculty, the panel, made up of 10 sitting and retired professors, recommended in a report released in December that BYU should discontinue two of the center's six four-year degrees.

A master's degree in international studies and a proposed major in developing countries also should be axed, according to the report by the panel, led by Reynolds.

The suggestion to yank the programs rests largely on the fact the Kennedy Center has no professors. It relies on professors from other departments to teach its classes.

But the center doesn't compensate departments for releasing faculty to teach in the IAS programs — or allow the academic departments to review or give input on how classes are taught.

"This has created enormous tension," said Reynolds.

Faculty willing to teach classes in their home departments in addition to IAS classes — often with little or no pay — has slipped significantly in the past five years, Reynolds said.

Carri P. Jenkins, the university's spokeswoman, said the university has not made any final decisions about the future of the program. "It's still very much in the review stage," she said.


E-MAIL: jeffh@desnews.com