The open-space initiative apparently will be on the ballot this November after all.

Both Cache and Utah counties now say enough valid signatures were collected to put the $150 million conservation bond before voters. The counties were ordered last week by the Utah Supreme Court to take another look at rejected names.

The results of that re-examination aren't expected to be certified by the state Elections Office until Monday, but the organization behind the petition drive, Utahns for Clean Water, Clean Air & Quality Growth, was already looking ahead to the election.

"We are still waiting for official word," Amanda Smith, the president of the organization, said. "But we feel confident that Utah's citizens have put this initiative on the ballot; clearly many people care about their future quality of life in this state."

Smith said in the next few weeks, the organization will gear up for the campaign. Voters will be asked to approve a bond that would be paid off in 10 years through a .05 increase in sales taxes.

The proceeds would be available to governments and non-profit groups for projects that protect the environment and preserve wildlife habitat, family farms, recreational opportunities and historic and cultural landmarks.

"We've had a bit of a late start, but we're energized by how much support we've received so far, and we're extremely confident that this issue will resonate with voters at the polls in November," she said.

The initiative almost didn't make it on the ballot because clerks in Cache and Utah counties invalidated petition signatures accompanied by an address that did not match the address on file for a registered voter by the same name.

Under the state's complex new initiative law, the number of signatures required is equal to 10 percent of the votes cast statewide in the most recent gubernatorial election, and the same 10 percent count in 26 of the state's 29 Senate districts.

The action by the county clerks left the petition drive 228 signatures short in a Cache County district and just two signatures short in a Utah County district. Smith's organization appealed, and the high court agreed the signatures shouldn't have been thrown out.

The ruling sent the rejected names back to the county clerks to recheck. State Elections Director Amy Naccarato said her office was notified Friday by Utah County that enough valid signatures had now been collected.

Cache County Clerk Jill Zollinger told the Deseret Morning News that a list of 565 certified signatures from the disputed district was mailed Friday to the Elections Office. Zollinger said the clerk's office reviewed some 715 signatures provided by the petition organizers.

"The process is a hard one, it really is, if the addresses don't match up," she said. "It's still questionable." Some names with addresses not in the system were rejected, Zollinger said, because they were shared by several voters.

Requiring petition signers to give their birthdate would help sort out the confusion, she said.

Kim Jackson, Utah County's clerk auditor, also questioned the process.

View Comments

"The Supreme Court has said you can't disqualify a name just because the address doesn't match," he said. "Am I totally comfortable with that interpretation? No, but without another system or way of checking, we have to count it."

Naccarato said lawmakers are already beginning a review of initiative process, and requiring a birthdate has already been raised. Attorneys on both sides of the issue argued before the high court that such additional information would make the process more accurate.


Contributing: Sharon Haddock

E-mail: lisa@desnews.com

Join the Conversation
Looking for comments?
Find comments in their new home! Click the buttons at the top or within the article to view them — or use the button below for quick access.