RICHMOND, Va. — The judge who will determine how much time Michael Vick spends in prison has shown little mercy over the years for high-profile defendants.

Nobody knows this better than defense lawyer Robert H. Smallenberg.

In 2004, he represented a city official who stole more than $1 million from Richmond taxpayers. He was well aware U.S. District Judge Henry E. Hudson had earned a reputation for handing down stiff sentences.

"Tough but fair" is the description most often heard from lawyers who appear before Hudson, who owns a bichon frise dog and declined to be interviewed.

"He's a good trial judge, but on sentencing he tends to be in the middle or upper range of the sentencing guidelines," said attorney Murray Janus. "A lot of judges start at the low end. Not Judge Hudson."

Still, Smallenberg was caught off-guard by how hard Hudson came down on his client. The judge sentenced Robert Evans to 10 years in prison — double what was called for under federal sentencing guidelines — declaring "the abuse of trust here is absolutely immeasurable."

"I wasn't surprised he went above the guidelines, but I was surprised he went that far," Smallenberg said.

Based on his personal experience, Smallenberg said he won't be surprised if Hudson takes a similarly tough position in the case of NFL star Vick, who is scheduled to plead guilty to a federal dogfighting conspiracy charge Monday.

A government official, speaking on condition of anonymity because terms of the plea agreement are not final, has told The Associated Press prosecutors will recommend a sentence of one year to 18 months. However, the maximum sentence is five years, and Hudson is not bound by any recommendation or by the federal sentencing guidelines.

Vick's lawyers will try for the shortest possible sentence.

"Unless they have some mitigating circumstances in their favor, they're going to have some problems," Smallenberg said.

Even so, Hudson likely will prove to be a tough sell.

View Comments

Rob Wagner, who leads the federal public defender's office in Richmond, said defense attorneys in Hudson's courtroom face a rough road when arguing mitigating factors should result in a sentence below the guideline.

"You know when you get Judge Hudson he's going to take a tough line in sentencing," he said.

Vick's attorney, Billy Martin, is aware of the challenge.

"We know we will be appearing before a judge who is considered a very fair judge but also a judge who is very firm," he said.

Join the Conversation
Looking for comments?
Find comments in their new home! Click the buttons at the top or within the article to view them — or use the button below for quick access.