The nation's poverty rate fell for the first time in a decade to 9.8 percent, a new census survey says.

And real median household income rose for the second year in a row, according to the 2007 Current Population Survey, released Tuesday by the U.S. Census Bureau. Nationally, the real median household income was $48,201 in 2006, an increase of 0.7 percent, or $356.

However, advocates for working families point out that individual earnings dropped by just over 1 percent for both men and women. The median income for men who worked full-time and year-round was $42,261 and was $32,515 for women. And the number of people who lack health insurance rose to 47 million, or 15.8 percent of the population.

"In a climate like this, too many workers lack the bargaining power to claim fair share," said Jared Bernstein, director of the Living Standards Program for the Economic Policy Institute.

Bernstein says members of American households collectively worked about 100 hours more in 2006 than in 2003. That meant about 3,100 hours of work per household in 2006.

In Utah, male workers are seeing a similar decline in wages as is evident on a national scale, says Juliette Tennert, the state's top demographer. However, unlike men, Utah's women saw no decline in wages.

"In general, we are following the trend of inflation outpacing wage growth," Tennert said. "We see the same thing on the national level."

However, Utah's median household income is rising and is higher than the national median. Utah's median household income was $55,619, according to a two-year average for 2005-06 in the Current Population Survey.

Tennert said Utah's strong economy has created a very low unemployment rate, which may mean that more people, particularly women, are entering the workforce.

Bill Tibbetts, anti-hunger director for Crossroads Urban Center, said he would have liked to have seen better improvements in the numbers, given Utah's low unemployment rate.

"Apparently a lot of working families are still struggling to make ends meet," he said, pointing to the rising cost of food, rent and public transportation.

Robert Greenstein, executive director of the Center of Budget and Policy Priorities, said there were some bright spots, such as the number and percentage of the elderly population in poverty, age 65 and older, which fell from 10.1 percent in 2005 to 9.4 percent, or 3.4 million people, in 2006.

That rate is among the lowest elderly poverty rates since 1959, the first year for which poverty data is available, said David Johnson, chief of housing and household economic statistics for the U.S. Census Bureau.

And the overall poverty rate, which had risen from 11.3 to 12.7 percent from 2000 to 2004, fell to 12.3 percent in 2006.

However, Greenstein said the positives were far outweighed by the negatives, such as the numbers of children and working-age adults in poverty, which remained unchanged at 12.8 million and 20.2 million, respectively.

View Comments

And the real median income for working-age households remains $1,300 below where it stood at the bottom of the economic recession in 2001, he said.

"We find the new figures disappointing for the fifth year of an economic recovery," he said. "Too many middle and low-income families are not sharing in the gains."

The information from the annual Social and Economic Supplement to the Current Population Survey of 100,000 addresses was released Tuesday, along with separate information from the American Community Survey, which samples 250,000 addresses each month.


E-mail: dbulkeley@desnews.com

Looking for comments?
Find comments in their new home! Click the buttons at the top or within the article to view them — or use the button below for quick access.