Changes come so fast in the world of computer technology that they sometimes leave the long arm of the law grasping at shadows, unable to keep up.
The latest problem deals with so-called "computer viruses" and similar mischief - hidden software programs that can severely damage or destroy information or operation of computer networks.Federal laws apparently are ambiguous enough that it may be difficult to prosecute such activity, even though it can cause widespread harm. An example of such harm occurred in 1988 when an electronic code was inserted in a national computer network, paralyzing about 6,000 computers across the country.
Lawyers defending the accused in that case say that while the law discusses "intent," it does not clearly define intent to commit large-scale damage. The law also does not cover situations where someone has legitimate access to the computer system where the damage was done.
If someone claims it was only a prank with no intent to cause damage, prosecution becomes uncertain. Convictions may be possible, but it would be better to tighten up the law and be more specific about what actions violate federal rules.
Bills before Congress seek to impose penalties on people convicted of interfering with the operations of computers through the use of programs containing hidden commands that can cause harm.
That seems more clear-cut than laws that vaguely quibble over intent and certain levels of damage. It probably would lead to easier prosecution of those who cause harm to sensitive - and enormously valuable - computer networks.
Such clarifying of the law will help - at least until some new technology creates problems not anticipated in the statutes. Given the rate of technological change, the law probably will always have to play catch-up.