POLLING DATA REVEAL THAT we consider education a major concern facing America. It's no wonder. Consider the following:
- By most measures of performance, American schoolchildren today learn little or no more than their parents, despite soaring educational spending;- In 1950, there were 1.55 non-teaching employees for each 100 students attending public schools; by 1993, that number more than tripled to 5.28;
- Average per-pupil costs of private schools in America are markedly lower than those in public schools, even though most evidence shows higher performance levels in private institutions;
- By one way of measuring, the productivity of public school employees today is about one-half of what it was in 1950, while overall output per worker in America about tripled;
- American kids do poorer on standardized tests in math and geography than those from such poorer nations as Hungrary and Slovenia;
- Americans are voting with their feet: private school enrollment has risen faster than that for public schools since 1991, and probably a million Americans (proponents say more) are home-schooled today, compared with negligible numbers a decade ago;
- Private-school teachers earn one-third less than their public-school counterparts but are more satisfied with their jobs and their students' performance.
Concern about our public schools is not new: In 1983 in "A Nation at Risk," a governmental commission argued that "the educational foundations of our society are presently being eroded by a rising tide of mediocrity that threatens our very future as a nation and a people."
Billions were spent on changes: raising teacher salaries, lowering class size, changing teacher certification, increasing graduation requirements, introducing merit pay, increasing student testing, etc. The results have been disappointing. Part of the reason relates to declining parental involvement tied in with increased non-traditional family living arrangements.
More fundamentally, however, like the old Soviet economy, our public schools are largely government monopolies that can ignore the discipline of the market. Competitive private firms increase profits by cutting costs and/or by increasing revenues by making customers happy. Mon-op-o-lis-tic schools, however, can deliver shoddy products because their massive subsidies shield them from the forces of demand and supply.
True reform would empower parents (consumers) to choose between schools in the same way that we decide which goods to buy in the supermarket.
Affluent families can beat the system, either by sending their children to private schools or by moving to upscale suburbs with good public schools. Even public-school teachers in the big cities disproportionately send their own children to private schools.
The poor, however, have little choice. That explains their support for "GI Bill for Kids" programs that would allow them the chance to attend private school with public support.
The American people can take only so much. As voter frustration passes a certain threshold, politicians will feel compelled to give parents the choice in education that they have in acquiring goods and services far less important to the future of our nation.