Recent events in Tucson have caused gun control to again be debated. I am amazed how polarizing arguments preclude a thoughtful and logical investigation of the impacts of legislation controlling firearm distribution and ownership. One might reasonably believe controlling who can legally own a firearm would decrease gun-related crimes and violence in our nation, yet this unfortunately is not true.
In the last eight years there have been many violent acts committed by persons wielding firearms acquired legally. Without a prior record, what would preclude these people from gun ownership? They followed the rules, received their firearms and then committed a violent act.
Gun control is a misnomer in that these laws control only those people who would legally own a weapon, are willing to abide by whatever regulations, waiting periods and mandated education required. But those who commit the majority of violent crimes find, purchase and carry guns without the consent of any ruling body.
Gun control diminishes the power law-abiding citizens have to live and protect themselves, and amplifies the power of criminals who want others to forcefully submit to their demands.
Dan Fairbanks
Logan