The Utah State Board of Education just struck a deal with Google to bring Gemini AI into every K-12 classroom in the state.

This is not innovation. It is the USBE being led, nose-ring first, by one of the wealthiest corporations on the planet, one whose business model is built on harvesting attention and monetizing data. And now we are handing them our children.

Fifty years after his warning, the USBE is proving Ivan Illich right when he said, “The hypothesis was that machines can replace slaves. The evidence shows that, used for this purpose, machines enslave men.”

What AI is actually doing in classrooms

Let me translate the press releases into plain English: children are not using AI to think more deeply. They are using it to avoid thinking altogether. They are using it to avoid thinking altogether. Nearly 9 in 10 students now use generative AI on academic work‚ and the vast majority do so in ways that violate their school’s academic integrity policies. Skipping the essay. Bypassing the hard problem. Outsourcing the very cognitive struggle that builds a human mind.

Grit is not a buzzword. It is the neurological mechanism by which mastery is formed.

Dr. Jared Cooney Horvath, a leading researcher on learning and the brain, is unambiguous: “Cognitive offloading isn’t a shortcut to learning — it’s a detour around it.” Higher-order thinking doesn’t arrive like a software update. It is built through friction, failure, and the slow, hard process of wrestling with difficult material.

Grit is not a buzzword. It is the neurological mechanism by which mastery is formed.

AI is a tool for people who have already built their cognitive foundation and can use it to offload busywork because they possess the judgment to evaluate what it produces. Giving AI to a child who hasn’t built that foundation yet isn’t acceleration. It’s amputation.

Related
Opinion: Taking the necessary time on AI policy is the right thing to do for kids

The class divide no one wants to talk about

Here is the part that should make every parent in Utah furious, regardless of their politics.

The elite private schools, the ones serving the children of executives, venture capitalists, and, yes, tech industry leaders, are quietly moving away from screen-saturated, Google-branded classrooms to more analog education: the Waldorf schools.

The people who build these tools do not let their own children use them unchecked in school. That fact should detonate like a bomb in every school board meeting in this state.

What does that mean for Utah’s public school students, the working-class kids in Ogden, the middle-class families in West Valley, the rural kids in Emery County? It means they are being handed the tools that wealthy parents are rejecting. It means the Google Classroom, Chromebook and now Gemini pipeline is increasingly a pipeline designed for other people’s children.

Illich warned that industrial tools “enslave men” and that neither the working class nor the leisure class could “escape the dominion of constantly expanding industrial tools,” he was describing exactly this dynamic: the powerful build the machines, and the less powerful are schooled to serve them.

The children of the wealthy will learn to own AI. The children in underfunded public schools will be trained to use it, and in doing so, will be trained out of the very cognitive capacities that might have allowed them to compete.

Related
Opinion: Utah is now strengthening and expanding American AI leadership — starting with students being taught in our local schools

This is not equity. This is a digital caste system being constructed with our tax dollars and our school board’s enthusiastic blessing.

What the USBE owes every Utah family

The USBE has framed this rollout as if parent opt-out is sufficient protection. It is not.

An opt-out framework places the burden on parents, most of whom have no idea what Gemini is, what data it collects or what neurological trade-offs accompany its use, to navigate a bureaucratic process to protect their children from a default their school board never should have set. It is a consent framework designed to minimize resistance, not maximize protection.

We do not apply opt-out logic to other risky educational decisions. We do not say, “We’ve decided your child will be in an unventilated classroom, but you can opt out.” We set standards that protect all children first.

The USBE must hear this clearly, from parents across this state:

We are not asking you to make AI opt-out — we are demanding you make it opt-in

No Utah student should be using Gemini or any generative AI tool in the classroom without explicit, informed written consent from their parent or guardian, consent that includes a plain-language explanation of what the tool does, what data it collects, and what the research says about its effects on learning and cognitive development.

Furthermore, we call for an immediate moratorium on AI integration in K-8 classrooms while an independent, non-Google-funded body of neuroscientists, educators and child development experts reviews the evidence and establishes genuine safety and efficacy standards.

2
Comments

Contact the USBE. Show up to their public meetings. Ask your child’s school what tools are being used and demand answers.

Related
Opinion: Don’t let AI become the next educational divide

You are not alone, and you are not powerless. Utah-based organizations like Child First Policy Center, Swimming Upscreen and G-Rated Schools are fighting alongside you (reach out to them).

The USBE has accepted Google’s leash and called it a gift. Our children deserve better. They deserve the struggle, the growth and the deep satisfaction of a mind that was built, not bypassed.

The window is closing. Let’s make some noise.

Join the Conversation
Looking for comments?
Find comments in their new home! Click the buttons at the top or within the article to view them — or use the button below for quick access.