KEY POINTS
  • Utah and Wyoming are pushing for a seven-state Colorado River deal before an Oct. 1 deadline, warning that failure to agree would trigger federal intervention and likely litigation from several states.
  • Utah officials say they support negotiated, shared conservation cuts and have offered to conserve up to 23,000 acre-feet while opposing the use of lawsuits or federal funds for interstate legal battles.
  • Basin leaders remain deadlocked over long-term allocations under the 1922 compact, while disputes continue over whether upstream reservoir releases like Flaming Gorge should be capped or used as an ongoing emergency supply tool.

The clock is ticking to decide who conserves how much water from the Colorado River during low water years. With the final deadline now less than four months away, Utah and Wyoming are trying to get their neighbor states to renew negotiations.

The water year ends Oct. 1.

If the seven basin states fail to reach an agreement by then, the Department of the Interior will impose a plan. Arizona and Colorado have both indicated they will pursue litigation if they feel the Interior’s plan is unfair.

The 1948 compact allocated 51.75% of the Upper Basin’s 7.5 million acre-feet to Colorado, 23% to Utah, 14% to Wyoming and 11.25% to New Mexico. Water was apportioned by quantity rather than percentage to Lower Basin states. California was given 4.4 million acre-feet, Arizona was given 2.8 million acre-feet and Nevada was given 0.3 million acre-feet.

“The window to solve this without lawyers, judges and generational damage to basin relationships is shrinking faster than Lake Powell,” said Amy Haas, the executive director of Colorado River Authority Utah, during her testimony before the Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee on Wednesday.

Upper Basin states (Utah, Colorado, New Mexico and Wyoming) and Lower Basin states (Arizona, California and Nevada) have been locked in a stalemate about negotiations for more than two years.

Political and environmental leaders from Utah and Wyoming convened on several occasions in Washington, D.C., this week to discuss how to get the ball rolling toward an agreement.

Related
The fight over water in the West

Utah joins forces with Wyoming’s political delegation

A meeting is held in the office of Sen. Mike Lee, R-Utah, third from right at table, with Utah Gov. Spencer Cox, second from right, Sen. John Curtis, R-Utah, right, and others, including from center-left side of the table, Sen. Cynthia Lummis, R-Wyo., Sen. John Barrasso, R-Wyo., Wyoming Gov. Mark Gordon and others at the Russell Senate Office Building in Washington, D.C., on Wednesday, June 10, 2026. | The office of Sen. John Barrasso

Utah Gov. Spencer Cox, Sen. Mike Lee, R-Utah, and Sen. John Curtis, R-Utah, joined Wyoming Gov. Mark Gordon, Rep. Cynthia Lummis, R-Wyo., and Sen. John Barrasso, R-Wyo., to discuss long-term Colorado River, Flaming Gorge Reservoir and Lake Powell management.

The river provides water to about 60% of Utah’s population and serves a significant portion of Wyoming’s southwestern population.

“We came to Washington, D.C., to have serious conversations about the future of the Colorado River Basin, and those conversations were productive,” Gordon said in a statement following the meeting.

Cox added, “Utah remains committed to a seven-basin-state solution that protects the long-term future of the Colorado River.”

“To those who contend that Utah and the Upper Division states are unwilling to put anything on the table: that is simply untrue.”

—  Amy Haas, executive director of Colorado River Authority Utah

“Any durable agreement must recognize the realities facing the Upper Basin, where communities are already living with significant shortages and doing their part to conserve water. We believe the best path forward is a fair, negotiated solution that keeps all states at the table and avoids years of costly litigation,” he said.

Related
Lake Powell drains faster than it fills. What can be done?

Utah’s position: No litigation, shared cuts, capped releases

The American flag and Utah’s state flag blow in the wind during the last day of the legislative session outside the Capitol in Salt Lake City on Friday, March 6, 2026. | Tess Crowley, Deseret News

As Haas testified before senators on Wednesday, she described Utah’s position in the ongoing river negotiations.

“Federal dollars should go toward infrastructure improvements, storage and conservation. Dollars should go to real, on-the-ground solutions that move the needle on supply, not to enrich lawyers,” Haas said.

She urged Congress to not fund lawsuits filed by basin states. “States that sue other states should not be rewarded,” she said.

Haas reaffirmed Utah’s willingness to make concessions. “To those who contend that Utah and the Upper Division states are unwilling to put anything on the table: that is simply untrue. I’m here to say, Utah is willing to secure commitments to conserve up to 23,000 acre-feet in 2027 and 2028 through our state conservation program.”

Annually, Utah uses around 1 million of its originally allocated 1.725 million acre-feet of Colorado River water.

Related
Utah Sen. Mike Lee says it’s time to rethink the Roadless Rule

Flaming Gorge cannot be an ‘unlimited emergency backstop,’ Haas says

The Flaming Gorge Dam is pictured on Sept. 13, 2004. | Tom Smart, Deseret News

Through next April, the Interior Department has required a release of 660,000 to 1 million acre-feet of water from Flaming Gorge to boost lower reservoirs and keep Lake Powell above critical elevations.

The releases are expected to raise Lake Powell’s water levels by 54 feet by April 2027.

Haas said Utah “cautiously supported” the decision, but stressed that “upstream releases will not save the system.”

“We are proposing that releases from Flaming Gorge and other facilities upstream are capped, fully recovered and effective in protecting Glen Canyon Dam, not simply used to increase downstream releases,” she said.

Flaming Gorge dam and recreation area on Sept. 13, 2004. | Tom Smart, Deseret News

Capping and replenishing all releases from upper basins would prevent them from becoming an “unlimited emergency backstop.”

Any releases from Upper Basin reservoirs should “not simply pad or provide extra water for downstream release purposes,” she said.

5
Comments

Mike Vickrey, a member of the Green River Valley Cattlemen’s Association, added, “From my perspective, a supply-driven model is imperative. As conditions continue to change, we must adapt to the actual amount of available water and continue to search for new sources of usable water.”

Related
Utah and federal government join forces to manage public lands

River leaders ask appropriations to be based on real hydrology

A group of river experts, scientists, water rights lawyers, tribal representatives, nonprofit representatives, philanthropists and river guides raft down Cataract Canyon on the Colorado River with the Returning Rapids Project on Sunday, Sept. 22, 2024. | Kristin Murphy, Deseret News

Tom Kiernan, the president and CEO of American Rivers, asked senators to encourage the Bureau of Reclamation to finalize guidelines “grounded in the hydrological reality of the basin.”

The root of the basin states’ allocation issues come from the original 1922 compact, which was based on unusually wet years, allocating each basin 7.5 million acre-feet of water.

For the past decade, and in many cases much longer than that, each state has used significantly less water than they are allocated.

Join the Conversation
Looking for comments?
Find comments in their new home! Click the buttons at the top or within the article to view them — or use the button below for quick access.